Isabel Anadon is currently a doctoral candidate in the Department of Sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her current research focuses on international migration focusing on state policy formation and the role of state and non-state actors in shaping law and policy. She currently is developing a theoretical framework to understand the role migrant sending countries play in shaping international migration through passage of national immigration laws.
Before coming to Madison to pursue a PhD, she assisted local Chicago communities and NGOs in influencing policy and legal processes within Illinois state government. This included efforts such as the development and eventual passage of Illinois law providing driver’s licenses to undocumented immigrants. Isabel’s previous work spanned immigration policy issues including integration, education, federal immigration policy and access to health care. Isabel has a Master’s in Public Policy from the University of Chicago and a dual B.A. in Anthropology and Psychology from the University of Notre Dame.
Cynthia Farid is a doctoral candidate at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School. Her research interests include a range of topics including legal history, legal theory, human rights, constitutional law and law and development. Prior to her current role in UW-Madison, Cynthia has professional experience working in legal practice as well as international development work comprising a range of human rights and rule of law programming with NGOs, INGOs, think tanks, and legal rights organizations. Having completed her bar in the UK and Bangladesh, she graduated with an LL.M from Cornell University.
Her doctoral project examines South Asian legal systems and contemporary discourses around legal and judicial reform. In particular, her project will look at the extent of Indian participation in the legal discourse around administrative and procedural reform during the late colonial period and trace continuities of these developments in contemporary South Asian states. The export of legal institutions became extensive political projects during the colonial period inspiring large-scale reform—a practice that continues in new forms in the contemporary era of globalization. These do not reflect past violence, injustices or the unequal structures upon which these legal regimes were built. This project will attempt to uncover some of these lost narratives through investigation of historical data and unearth how legal agents have contributed to discursive formations of legal institutions. These may be captured in the legislative and administrative debates between legal actors about reforming key institutions, including civil courts and related procedural laws. Judicial recruitment policies may also reveal how existing laws were applied and implemented in colonial India. The project aims to locate the roots of contemporary reform discourses within this history and trace continuities of these institutions across the colonial, postcolonial and to some extent the post-development era. In so doing, this project hopes to engage in archival, comparative and socio-legal methodologies and in line with the Law and Society Association’s recent turn to internationalization, contribute to the study of law and society in South Asia from an interdisciplinary perspective.
Daanika Gordon is a doctoral candidate in the department of sociology at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Her research interests broadly span the sociology of law, race and ethnicity, and urban sociology. More specifically, she studies how legal institutions produce symbolic boundaries that in turn constitute the basis of inequalities in the state’s service provision and social control. In her dissertation, she explores the processes by which different places in the city come to experience divergent styles of policing. The project examines the case of an urban Midwestern police department’s redistricting process and uses a multi-method approach including in-depth interviews, ethnographic observation, and descriptive statistical analysis. It first identifies the actors and interests that construct citywide policing priorities. It then examines the consequences of these priorities on the social organization of policing at the district-level and the on-the-ground activities of police officers. In addition to exploring sources of potential divergence in policing practices, this project further theorizes the social construction of urban spaces. By centering a reform that partitioned the city along meaningful axes and allocated resources on the basis of these divisions, it identifies the processes that actively produce divergent symbolic and material qualities of place.
Daanika’s other research focuses on both criminal and civil legal settings. In a previous study, she used ethnographic and interview data to explore the role that family analogy plays in the governance strategies of a drug treatment court. In addition, as a project assistant for Professor Tonya Brito and Professor David Pate, she contributes to a study that utilizes qualitative methods to examine how different models of legal assistance affect child support enforcement proceedings for low-income litigants. Daanika received her B.A. in sociology and development studies from the University of California, Berkeley.
Camden Hutchison is a Ph.D. Candidate in history at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research focuses on the intellectual and political development of U.S. legal-economic policy, particularly in the areas of taxation, antitrust, and corporate governance. His most recent publication, "The Historical Origins of the Debt-Equity Distinction" (Florida Tax Review), investigates the political history of the disparate tax treatment of corporate debt and equity. His current research project examines the influence of law and economics scholarship on Supreme Court antitrust jurisprudence during the late twentieth century. This research has been supported by the Social Science Research Council, the University of Chicago Library, the Hoover Institution, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Camden received his B.A. in history from the University of Rochester. He holds a J.D. from Columbia Law School and was previously a corporate attorney at the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
Walker Kahn is a graduate student in Community & Environmental Sociology at University of Wisconsin-Madison and a JD student at the University of Wisconsin Law School. He is a graduate fellow at the Institute for Research on Poverty as well as the Institute for Legal Studies. His current research focuses on financialization, civil rights, the structure of consumer credit markets, and commodity chain connections linking lenders and borrowers. Previously he has worked on corporate governance, shareholder value, and corporate social responsibility.
I am a second-year LLM/SJD student at University of Wisconsin Law School from South Korea with an interest in gender and women studies, especially marriage law. I am passionate about modern changes of marriage as well as historical formation of marriage law under colonialism in East Asian countries. Prior to coming to the US, I studied constitutional law at Korea Law School and, after graduating from it, I worked at Korea University Legal Research Institute and Korea Institute of Criminology as a researcher. I received an LLM degree from University of Minnesota Law School and graduated from New School Social Research in New York with a MA degree in sociology.
I am currently working on my LLM thesis “Categorizing Nationality: Recognized Nationality of Members of Bu-Yong-Hoe, the Association of Japanese Wives in Korea.” During the colonial period, Japan employed a unique assimilation policy, ‘ interracial marriage' between Japanese and Koreans. Many Japanese women and Korean men married in support of Japanese government, and after the liberation of Korea, they moved to Korea together. At that time, Korean society was full of animosity against Japan, and Japanese wives were marginalized from their local communities and even from their family-in-law. Most of Japanese wives returned to Japan after the normalization of diplomatic relation between Korea and Japan, but some of them chose to stay with their Korean families. They built Bu-Yong-Hoe, the association of remained Japanese wives in Korea and began to gather together regularly. In the thesis, I would look for the main elements of nationality-recognizing process of Bu-Yong-Hoe members through in-depth interview, and by understanding the composition of nationality, I’d like to contribute to making better immigration policies and laws especially for transnational-transcultural couples.
I am a lawyer and a PhD candidate in Environmental Studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. My research addresses the relationship between legal pluralism and environmental sustainability. I developed an interest in this topic over time. After graduating from William and Mary School of Law in 2006, I joined the Faculty of Law at Haramaya University in Ethiopia as an Assistant Professor. There I taught public international law and environmental law for three years. I encountered many problems relating to the enforcement of posited law and became interested in informal rule systems for regulating the environment. My interests led me to my current program of study which is interdisciplinary and provided valuable training in sociological and planning methods. Armed with these additional tools, I conducted dissertation research in Kenya in 2014, mostly involving semi-structured interviews with khat farmers, individual and group interviews with local government officials, and an investigation of relevant archival materials. My dissertation is entitled, “Factors That Impact Legal Pluralism and Its Sustainability: Learning from Case Studies of Land Use Regulation Among Khat Farmers in Kenya.” In the dissertation, I make the argument that regulating and incentivizing land use in Kenya has a record of failure because of over-emphasis on formal property and land use law. I develop three case studies that look at land use decisions among khat farmers at the study site in Meru, Kenya. (Khat is a legal, but often socially unacceptable, drug crop in Kenya.) The case studies are on tree cutting regulations, privatization of forested hilltops, and small irrigation groups. Looking at the role of formal and informal authorities across the case studies, I highlight how important community autonomy and group norms are to making formal land use regulation work. Currently I am writing the fourth chapter of my dissertation; my goal is to defend by summer of 2016.
Emma Shakeshaft is a doctoral student in the Sociology Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She received her J.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School, where she worked on the Wisconsin International Law Journal and the Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society. She is currently a member of the State Bar of Wisconsin. She received her M.S. in Sociology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and her B.A. in sociology and international Relations from the University of Southern California.
Emma’s dissertation research analyzes the legal interpretations and procedures of judges, lawyers, and governmental actors by examining case outcomes based on gender, nationality, and race. She also investigates decision-making patterns within different legal and governmental institutions in order to determine if these decision-making processes are based on certain types of racial definitions and understandings. Emma’s research also addresses racial and gender disparities in legal resource allocation. More specifically, her dissertation examines transracial adoption case law, human trafficking case law, and data from the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) relating to the allocation of two nonimmigrant visas, U-Visas and T-Visas.
Emma’s broader research interests include race and ethnicity, specifically the social construction of race through law, critical race theory, criminal justice, immigration law, and family law.
My research is grounded in the urban planning and policy professions and my methods employ pragmatic philosophy and symbolic interactionism. I investigate developments within the community food system and how governments codify those innovations into the web of food system policies. I believe that applied and evaluation research must recognize the interactions between people, place, and policy as well as the connections among federal, state, and local laws. Within this context, land use policies are an internal and emergent feature of communities, and I am particularly interested in how community food systems interact with the web of federal, state, and local policies.
My pre-dissertation pilot study evaluated the legal consciousness of community farmers to understand how, where, and with what effect they mobilize food system policy. The findings describe the chain of relationships between the policy user (i.e., farmer) and the policy-maker (i.e., government entity). This research contributes to the study of law and society because it reinforces the premise that legal meanings emerge from the interplay of actors, objects and law. Law is a process and the relative stability of social and institutional environments impact legal consciousness and vice versa. My dissertation will build upon this study to develop a better understanding of land access issues among community farmers.
I am using the the Institute for Legal Studies fellowship to advance my research for academic- and practice-oriented audiences and to further embody pragmatism and social-legal theory. It is also an opportunity to establish roots with the law and society intellectual community and to steep myself in a tradition that provides many opportunities.
I am currently a doctoral student in the Sociology Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Before entering the PhD program, I received my M.A. degree in Gender and Women’s Studies at UW-Madison and my B.A. degree in International Relations at Xiamen University. My research interests are in the areas of legal consciousness, social movement, gender and sexuality with an empirical focus on China. My dissertation is a study of grey-area activism. It focuses on how marginalized communities (queer women) can mobilize around law-related issues (LGBTQ and NGO activities) under an authoritarian regime (China). I define “grey-area” as a negotiating site among contesting interpretations of what is legal. To shed new light on scholarship of legal consciousness, mobilization and coalition-building, I move away from simply observing (dis)obedience and resistance to “law on the books” towards understanding relational processes by which communities contextualize “law in action.” How does variation in political context within one nation-state impact these processes and shape local activism in the grey-area? My dissertation is a multi-sited ethnography in three Chinese metropolises with different patterns of political “greyness” in regards to three key factors for queer women’s activism, namely state control, NGO network strength, and gender norms. I compare how queer feminist activists construct legality to justify their collective action, consolidate communities, and build coalitions across regions.