The content of this article is more than 5 years old. Please be aware that information provided may no longer be accurate, up-to-date, or relevant.

After a federal judge in Virginia struck down portions of the recent health care reform bill, the Wisconsin Radio Network turned to UW Law professor Andrew Coan for commentary.

Professor Coan told WRN that the decision could energize opponents of the law, who have long claimed the act was unconstitutional. However, the judge's decision not to enter an injunction limits the immediate impact of the decision.

A summary of the story is available here. To listen to the story, click here.

WRN is not the only media outlet to have enlisted Professor Coan's constitutional law expertise on what is shaping up to be "the biggest constitutional law dispute in the country." The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel also talked to Professor Coan.

Some opponents of the health care law focus on the so-called "individual mandate," a provision of the law that would require everyone to have some form of health insurance. They say that while Congress has some authority to regulate economic activity, it lacks the authority to regulate this kind of economic inactivity.

Professor Coan said that distinction might be irrelevant if regulating inactivity is necessary to make Congress's regulation effective.

You can read the full article here.

Submitted by UW Law School News on December 15, 2010

This article appears in the categories: In the Media

lock