The rich intellectual environment at University of Wisconsin Law School is driven by a faculty of renowned legal scholars and innovative thinkers. They are the thought provokers. The idea generators. The pathbreakers who ask tough questions.
This stellar scholarly tradition makes UW Law the vibrant institution it is today.
Torey Dolan: Weaving the Thread
"The Wisconsin Idea should be felt on every Reservation." It's a commitment Torey Dolan made to herself as a scholar: to not abandon her roots as an advocate and a practitioner. And it's a thread she weaves through her work as an assistant professor at University of Wisconsin Law School. Dolan's scholarship often centers on election law as it intersects with tribal sovereignty. "I always want my work to have a practical utility to it," said Dolan, a citizen of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. "I also want to ensure that my work has continued relevance to Tribal communities I serve and similarly situated Tribal communities. If my work can influence courts, policy makers, tribal governments or Native people toward solutions that are pro-democracy and pro-voter, then I'll be thrilled." Read more.
William Clune on Law and Social Science
William Clune, professor emeritus at UW Law School, recently published "Law and Social Science: A Spectrum from Inside to Outside." The paper, published in July, is an overview of law and social science, starting with an inside perspective looking out from legal texts and lawyers' practice, then from outside looking in. "The interdisciplinary movements discussed in this article represent a bridge between two systems: law and social science," he wrote. "Consider this essay a heuristic conversation starter," Clune continued. Clune's past research has included school law, special education, public employee interest arbitration, school site autonomy and systemic educational policy, among others. His present research includes "program adequacy" and systemic policy in math and science education.
SDRI: 'Can State Prohibitions on Election Interference Constrain Federal Actors?'
Recent federal efforts to exert control over state elections appear likely to intensify as the 2026 midterms approach. A recent explainer from the State Democracy Research Initiative (SDRI) examines state laws that provide a potential pathway for reining in federal electoral overreach. "Can State Prohibitions on Election Interference Constrain Federal Actors?," written by Danielle Friedman, Bryna Godar and Emily Lau, aims to shed light on existing state6 laws criminalizing election-related misconduct and their potential application to curb improper actions by federal government officials. The explainer focuses on those provisions of state election codes that criminalize behavior that experts anticipate the federal government may engage in during the November 2026 elections.

