The UW Law School will present a public forum on the Supreme Court's role in the election-deciding lawsuit Bush v. Gore on Saturday, March 31, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. in Godfrey & Kahn Hall (Room 2260). Law School professors Ann Althouse, Carin Clauss, David Schwartz, Cheryl Weston and Bill Whitford and political science/law professor Donald Downs will participate in a panel discussion in the morning (10 a.m. to 12:15) and will host an open discussion with students and other audience members in the afternoon (1 to 4 p.m.)

Questions to be addressed include: Would we have been better off if the Supreme Court had allowed more counting? Or were we headed into endless, unresolvable controversies that we are better off having been spared? Is it the Supreme Court's role to rescue us from political disarray? Is the Court capable of providing this service without itself falling prey to partisan preference?

Also to be discussed is the following hypothetical situation: ?Suppose it had been Gore v. Bush, not Bush v. Gore. Same facts, but now Gore holds the narrow lead, and Bush is keen on counting every vote, while Gore supporters express agitation about the potential for mischief and fraud. Would the Supreme Court justices have taken the positions they did? If you think not, what does that say about the place of the Court and the role of law in American society today??

The public is invited. Admission is free.

Submitted by on March 16, 2001

This article appears in the categories: Articles