Update, Sept. 27, 2023: U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman ruled that Scott Panetti’s well-documented mental illness and disorganized thought prevent him from understanding the reason for his execution, effectively meaning he is not competent to face such a punishment. It is unclear whether Texas will appeal the ruling. Learn more in this story by The Associated Press.
Does a mentally ill man have a “rational understanding” of why he faces the death penalty in Texas?
That's the question University of Wisconsin Law School clinical professor Greg Wiercioch has answered in court recently on behalf of his schizophrenic and delusional client, who was convicted of killing his parents-in-law in 1992.
It has been a long and winding path for Wiercioch, who has represented Scott Panetti since 2003 and landed him a stay of execution in 2014.
In October 2022, a federal district court judge heard testimony over whether Panetti meets the standard the U.S. Supreme Court outlined in Wiercioch's winning case in 2007: Does Panetti have a rational understanding of the link between his crime and the impending punishment?
“It is unprecedented to be litigating on an execution competency claim for 20 years now,” Wiercioch said in his opening statements Oct. 24, 2022, as reported in The Texas Tribune.
The judge was not expected to rule on Panetti’s competence until 2023.
Submitted by Law School News on October 4, 2023