Mario Victoria Vasquez walked free in January 2015 from a Wisconsin jail after serving nearly 17 years for child sexual assault, and today the the prosecutor announced he will dismiss the charges. Mr. Victoria Vasquez's conviction was vacated after the prosecutor stipulated to a new trial and the court vacated the conviction. The conviction was set aside on the basis of powerful new evidence of innocence, including new evidence that another man was likely the perpetrator of the sexual assault on the pre-school-aged victim. In early February 2015, the State dismissed the charge and stated that it would not retry the case. Mr. Victoria Vasquez's conviction was overturned without the benefit of DNA.
Seneca Malone was convicted of first degree intentional homicide in 2008. The conviction was based almost entirely on the statement of one person who said he witnessed the shooting. In 2010, the Wisconsin Innocence Project began investigating Mr. Malone's case. The law students and supervising attorney discovered that trial counsel was ineffective in his representation of Mr. Malone. Trial counsel failed to investigate the veracity of the witness' statement and failed to call any witnesses in Mr. Malone's defense. During an 8 day evidentiary hearing, the Wisconsin Innocence Project called over 10 witnesses. The testimony presented included an alibi witness and evidence that the single witness who identified Mr. Malone was the actual perpetrator. On November 16th, 2012, Judge Borowski granted Mr. Malone a new trial. Shortly before retrial, the State offered Mr. Malone a plea deal that would guarantee he would not return to prison. After much consideration, Mr. Malone choose to take this offer rather than face the uncertainties of a jury trial. This difficult decision is one that many wrongfully convicted individuals face. Mr. Malone is happy to be able to spend time with his family and not face further time in prison.
Joseph Frey was convicted in 1993 of a sexual assault of a young college woman in her Oshkosh dorm room two years earlier. Mr. Frey became a suspect after the Green Bay Police Department informed the Oshkosh Police Department that he had committed two sexual assaults in the Green Bay area. On October 15, 2012, the Wisconsin Innocence Project, acting through a federally funded Bloodsworth Post-Conviction DNA Testing Assistance Grant, called for post-conviction DNA testing of a semen-stained bed sheet that had been stored in evidence. The sheets were the sole remaining piece of crime-scene evidence; a previously-collected rape kit, along with other pieces of physical evidence, had been improperly destroyed prior to trial. The sheets were nonetheless tested in 1993 and excluded Frey as the contributor. At trial, the State argued that the stains could have been left behind from consensual intercourse. The new DNA evidence not only excluded Mr. Frey as a suspect, but implicated convicted offender James E. Crawford. In April 2014, Mr. Frey received the maximum compensation for wrongful convictions from the state of Wisconsin.
Cody Vandenberg was convicted of attempted murder and armed robbery in 1996, in Brown County. The victim was repeatedly stabbed and his credit cards taken. The police found the victim’s wallet on the state’s witness during his arrest. Yet the state relied on this witness and the victim’s shaky identification to convict Mr. Vandenberg. The state gave the witness immunity on the attempted murder charge in exchange for his testimony against Cody. Cody was convicted and sentenced to 80 years. The state’s witness was sentenced to 20 years on the armed robbery charge. Cody’s first post-conviction motion and appeal were unsuccessful. The court of appeals ruled that Cody’s alibi evidence was not newly discovered evidence and that trial counsel made reasonable efforts to investigate the alibi. While the first appeal was pending, the state’s witness admitted to a prison social worker that he alone committed the stabbing and armed robbery. The Wisconsin Innocence Project filed a second post-conviction motion, which the trial court denied without a hearing. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the real controversy as to the identity of the shooter was not fully and fairly tried. Newly discovered evidence of the victim’s high blood alcohol content at the time of the crime (which affected the reliability of his identification of Mr. Vandenberg as the shooter) and the state’s witness’s recantation to the social worker were important evidence the court of appeals relied upon in reversing Mr. Vandenberg's convictions. Shortly before the scheduled retrial, the state offered reduced charges with a maximum sentence of 12 years in prison. Cody had already served 14 years. Cody decided to plead to a crime he did not commit to avoid the risk of conviction.
Robert Lee Stinson was convicted of the 1985 murder of a Milwaukee woman. Mr. Stinson's conviction rested almost exclusively on bite-mark identification purporting to match Mr. Stinson's teeth to bite patterns found on the victim's body. In 2005, the Wisconsin Innocence Project accepted Mr. Stinson's case and developed two kinds of new evidence. First, DNA testing revealed male DNA in saliva on the victim's sweater, and this DNA excluded Mr. Stinson. Second, working with California forensic science expert Christopher Plourd, the Wisconsin Innocence Project arranged for the bite-marks to be re-examined by a panel of four nationally-recognized experts, Dr. Gregory Golden, Dr. David Senn, Dr. Norman Sperber, and Dr. Denis Murmann. Using modern methods, the panel unanimously concluded that Mr. Stinson's teeth could not have inflicted the bites. The Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office did not oppose Mr. Stinson's motion to reverse his conviction, and he was freed. Bite-mark identification has been implicated in numerous other wrongful convictions around the country. In April 2014, received compensation for his wrongful incarceration after Governor Walker signed Assembly Bill 290 into law.
Chaunte Ott was convicted of the 1995 murder of a teenage runaway in Milwaukee. His conviction rested on testimony from two other men who claimed they committed the crime with Mr. Ott. Both of the other men pled guilty to lesser charges, while Mr. Ott stood trial for murder and was convicted by a jury. Mr. Ott was released in 2008 based on DNA test results that strongly supported his claim of innocence. The State Crime Laboratory found that male DNA found in the victim in Mr. Ott's case matched male DNA found at the scenes of two other unsolved murders committed after Mr. Ott went to prison, suggesting that a single perpetrator - someone other than Mr. Ott - committed all three crimes. The Wisconsin Innocence Project filed a motion for a new trial in Milwaukee County Circuit Court. The trial court denied the motion, but the Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed and Mr. Ott was freed.
Jarrett Adams and two co-defendants were charged with sexually assaulting a young woman at UW-Whitewater in 1998. After learning that an eyewitness, who saw the three young men chatting with the complaining witness outside her dormitory later in the evening after the alleged sexual assault had occurred, had not been called to testify at trial to corroborate the defendants' claim that there had been no sexual assault, the Wisconsin Innocence Project sought federal habeas corpus relief on the basis that trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to present the testimony of this witness. In June 2006, the U.S.Court of Appeals issued an opinion agreeing that the witness was critical to Mr. Adams' claim of innocence, and that counsel was ineffective for failing to call him. The court vacated Mr. Adams' conviction and ordered the state to either retry him or dismiss the case. The state subsequently dismissed the charges in full. Mr. Adams received his Bachelor's degree in 2012 and is currently attending law school. Mr. Adams co-founded Life After Justice to provide re-entry services.
Jeffrey Dake was convicted in 1998 of sexually assaulting a 14 year old girl in Langlade County. In 2006, the Wisconsin Innocence project filed a motion with the court, claiming that the jury did not hear critical new evidence that would have undermined the State's case against Mr. Dake: one of the key witnesses against Mr. Dake was sexually assaulting the victim during the same time period as alleged against Mr. Dake and the witness had negotiated a deal with the State in his own case in exchange for his testimony against Mr. Dake. In 2007, the court awarded Mr. Dake the right to a new trial, but shortly thereafter, the State dismissed all charges against Mr. Dake. Mr. Dake spent ten years in prison before his release in 2007.
David Sanders was a Franciscan Brother and school teacher who was convicted in Milwaukee County Circuit Court of molesting a young boy more than 20 years earlier. After he had served 7 months in prison, the state joined with the Wisconsin Innocence Project in asking the court to dismiss the case on the basis that Mr. Sanders was completely innocent. While Mr. Sanders was in prison, the victim's grandmother found a letter that had been written about the time of the crime from a different "Brother David," which implicated that man in the assault. When confronted, the other Brother David (not Brother David Sanders) admitted to the sexual assaults on the boy.
Evan Zimmerman was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide in Eau Claire County and sentenced to life in prison in 2001. On appeal, his conviction was reversed because his trial lawyer had failed to provide constitutionally adequate assistance. Among other errors, trial counsel neglected to introduce crime scene DNA evidence that excluded Zimmerman, failed to present expert testimony from the Milwaukee County Medical examiner that contradicted the state's theory of the crime, and failed to challenge hypnotically refreshed testimony offered by the state. At Zimmerman's retrial in April 2005, which was to last two weeks, the state moved to dismiss all charges after the fourth day of trial. The Wisconsin Innocence Project represented Zimmerman on appeal, alleging six grounds for reversal of his conviction, including insufficient evidence, ineffective assistance of counsel, and newly discovered evidence. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed Zimmerman's conviction based on ineffective assistance of counsel.
Maurice Carter was in Benton Harbor, Michigan, the day an off-duty police officer was shot. The victim and his wife said they hadn’t seen the shooter and could not give a detailed description. The police asked Maurice to come to the crime scene. The store clerk said that Maurice was not the shooter. She said Maurice had a light complexion; the shooter had very dark complexion. The police let Maurice go. Two years later, the police arrested Wilbur Gillespie for selling heroin. He had a long record and faced a life sentence if convicted. The police said that they would let him go if he would identify Maurice as the off-duty police officer’s shooter. The local paper ran a front-page story with a big picture of Maurice's face, saying the police had arrested the off-duty police officer’s shooter. The next week, the police conducted in a lineup. Even thought the victim and his wife had told the police two years before that they couldn’t describe the shooter, they identified Maurice as the person. Another witness who identified Maurice as the shooter was in a second-floor office across the street from the store at the time of the shooting. At trial, defense counsel did not bring up the victim’s initial statement that he could not describe the shooter. Even though Gillespie told the jury that he made up the story to get out of trouble for dealing drugs, and that he knew Maurice was asleep in his room when the shooting occurred, the jury convicted. The Innocence Project became involved in the case along with Illinois and Michigan innocence projects. Together they filed a postconviction motion on Maurice’s behalf alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, withholding of exculpatory evidence by the prosecutor and newly discovered evidence. They also petitioned the Michigan Governor for executive clemency, based on both his innocence and his need for medical treatment. While the motion was pending, the governor granted clemency on the basis of Maurice’s poor health. Maurice lived for three months outside prison before he died of liver disease.
Steven Avery was convicted of sexual assault, attempted murder, and false imprisonment in Manitowoc County in 1985. The convictions were based almost entirely upon the testimony of a single eyewitness, supported to a much lesser degree by microscopic hair examination evidence and purportedly incriminating statements made by Mr. Avery. Eighteen years later, in 2003, DNA evidence proved that Mr. Avery was not the perpetrator. The DNA profile also matched another man who was by then serving a 60-year sentence for sexual assaults convicted after the assault in this case. In 2007, Steven Avery was convicted of murdering 25 year old Teresa Halbach and sentence to life in prison. The Wisconsin Innocence Project did not represent him in that case.
Other Non-WIP Wisconsin Cases:
- Maxwell Verkuilen was convicted in Outagamie County and sentenced to four years in prison. He was convicted of 3rd degree sexual assault and the primary evidence against him was the false testimony by a SANE nurse and the victim. Verkuilen was exonerated after the Court affirmed that his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to call an expert who could show that there was a reasonable possibility that a sexual assault did not occur. In 2007, Verkuilen was exonerated and later received $25,000 compensation from the Claims Board.
- Eugene Glenn was convicted in Milwaukee County and sentenced to 20 years in prison for a robbery that occurred in 2001. He was convicted primarily on the basis of an identification made by a single eyewitness, the victim of the robbery. Glenn was exonerated in October 2003 after his public defender tracked down leads never followed by the police, and found the true perpetrator, who confessed.
- Michael Piaskowski was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide for a 1992 murder in Brown County. His conviction was affirmed on appeal in state court. The federal district court, however, granted habeas corpus relief, and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in 2001, holding that the evidence against Piaskowski was legally insufficient to sustain the conviction.
- Thomas Murphy was convicted in a 1998 trial in Portage County of two counts of both first and second-degree sexual assault. The trial court granted a new trial based on evidentiary errors, including erroneous reliance at trial on inconclusive hair examination testing to suggest that the hairs came from the defendant. The defendant was acquitted at the retrial, after approximately 2 1/2 years in prison.
- Samuel Hogan was convicted in Milwaukee County of second-degree sexual assault arising from an incident in April 1995. Hogan's conviction was reversed on appeal in 1997 based on a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel failed to investigate and present exculpatory evidence. The district attorney's office chose not to retry the defendant.
- Anthony Hicks was convicted of sexual assault in Dane County in 1991. The conviction was obtained largely by eyewitness testimony and microscopic hair examination. DNA subsequently proved that the hairs, which had been attributed to Hicks, could not have been his. The Supreme Court reversed the conviction, and the prosecution dismissed the case, after Hicks had served approximately five years in prison.
- Cornelius Reed was convicted of first-degree intentional homicide in Milwaukee County for a 1992 drive-by shooting. In 1996 the Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and granted a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The new evidence more reliably pointed to another individual as the murderer. Reed was retried but acquitted at the new trial, after approximately three years in prison.
- Fredric Saecker was convicted in 1989 in Buffalo County of second-degree sexual assault, burglary, and kidnapping. His conviction rested on circumstantial evidence (he was seen walking on the highway near the crime with blood on his hands) and incriminating statements he allegedly made while in jail, He did not fit the victim's description, and she and her husband could not identify him. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. Six years later, in 1995, DNA testing established that the semen collected from the victim could not have come from him, and his conviction was set aside.
- Albert Luster was convicted in Milwaukee County of first-degree sexual assault of a child for an incident that allegedly occurred in 1990. The trial court granted a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The case was subsequently dismissed.
- Francis Phillip Hemauer was convicted in a 1968 abduction, rape, and attempted murder in Milwaukee County, and sentenced to 60 years in prison. The primary evidence against him was eyewitness testimony of the victim and incriminatory statements he allegedly made during custodial questioning. His conviction was affirmed by the supreme court. The conviction was subsequently set aside, however, with the agreement of the Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office, when serological tests (non-DNA) proved that he was not the source of the seminal deposits in the victim's underwear. He was released in 1981, after eight years in prison.
- In In re DSC, a juvenile was adjudicated delinquent in Rock County upon a finding that he committed first-degree intentional homicide in 1985. the adjudication rested on the eyewitness testimony of a five-year-old child. The adjudication was reversed on newly discovered evidence: an older boy confessed that he alone committed the crime.
- In In re Curtis S., a juvenile was adjudicated delinquent in Milwaukee County upon a finding that he committed first-degree sexual assault in 1995. The trial court reversed the adjudication upon a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel. Counsel had failed to present evidence from the alleged victim's family and school that the child was a pathological liar, and had repeatedly made false abuse allegations against teachers at school. After the trial court granted a new trial, the district attorney's office dismissed the case.
If you know of other wrongful convictions in Wisconsin - defined as cases in which the conviction was vacated and charges were then dropped or the defendant was acquitted, for reasons other than bars to use of evidence or to retrial unrelated to innocence (such as Fourth Amendment or double jeopardy bars) - please contact us at (608) 262-1002 or Wisconsin Innocence Project, 975 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706. Thank you.